Archive for the ‘Interesting Article’ Category

Ethics in the cafe: what’s the purpose of the condiment bar?

Tuesday, July 15th, 2008

Exactly what’s the purpose of the condiment bar in a coffee shop?  What’s the intended use?  What should be a customer’s expectation?

Here’s a story about a cafe owner going berserk over a customer ordering a “double espresso poured over ice.”  It turns out this is a way for people to save money / rip-off a cafe on the purchase of a latte.  For example, by ordering espresso+ice and then filling up with “free” milk at the condiment bar, one can save a buck or two on the cost of the drink.

I’m so clueless … err, I mean ethical … I had no idea.

There’s a whole slew of interesting ethical questions here.  But then I was shocked to realize that I might be one of them: I like a lot of milk/creamer in my coffee.  Up to and including making it a full-on cafe au lait.  I frequently pour out a half-inch or more of my coffee (even after I ask for “room”) to be able to put more milk in.

I had never thought twice about it.  But sometimes I’d wonder why they never really give me “room” when I ask for “room”!  Hmm.  Am I violating some kind of implicit contract between the establishment and myself? If so, then what should I be ordering?  “Cafe au lait” usually is not what I’m going for.  What’s half-way betwen that and black coffee?  Is a “latte” what I’m describing?

I’ve always intentionally avoided learning all of the froo-froo names of the various coffee drinks.  “A man’s drink has a name which is a list of its ingredients”, you know.  Maybe it’s time I start — for all I know, I’ve been drinking back-alley lattes for years.

St. Genesius: Patron saint of actors, clowns, and lawyers

Friday, June 27th, 2008

St. Genesius Who knew?  This morning I was listening to my favorite local radio talent, the Rick Emerson Show, and I learned about St. Genesius, who is the Patron saint of actors, clowns, and lawyers.

I attempted to find out how “lawyers” figures in there, and only found one small mention of the ironic (or not) inclusion, and no conclusive information.

St. Genesius info:

Wikipedia

Saints Preserved

Ethics in medicine: The right to our day in court?

Monday, April 7th, 2008

Out in the real world, where sometimes things do go wrong, is it ethical for practitioners to require patients to waive their legal rights, when nearly all practitioners in the area do so?

Randy Cohen, in The Ethicist, says “It is not.” A related issue is, what criteria can doctors use to choose their patients? He sums up by writing, “The right to our day in court should be among the inviolable.” The article is good food for thought:

New York Times Magazine / The Ethicist: Doctor, Bully